The AI sounds certain.
They can't tell.
Qu Review is an independent second opinion on the AI answers your student is working from — what it got wrong, what it left out, and what to ask next.
Example. ChatGPT says Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence alone and that all 56 delegates signed it on July 4, 1776. Qu Review scores the answer 2.4 out of 5, "needs work", and corrects both points: a Committee of Five drafted it, with Jefferson writing the first draft, and most delegates signed on August 2.
Billed today, then $99 a year. Cancel anytime.
What it does
-
Catches wrong facts
Dates, numbers, names, attributions — with the correction next to them.
-
Finds what's missing
The context the AI skipped, and why it changes the argument.
-
Gives them the next question
What to ask so they actually understand the material.
Why it matters
The research is fast.
Checking it isn't.
Every AI tells students to verify the facts. The catch: when you're researching something you don't already know, you can't tell which facts need verifying.
Wrong slips through quietly
A confident paragraph with one bad date reads exactly like a correct one. That's the kind that gets marked down.
A finished answer isn't understanding
Reviewing the answer turns "copy it" into "check it" — and the follow-up questions are where the learning actually happens.
Schools are still writing the AI rules
The line between study aid and academic dishonesty keeps moving. Nobody should hand in work they can't defend.
Inside a review
Three reviewers read it.
Each looks for something different.
Your student pastes nothing and switches nothing. Inside ChatGPT or Claude, they ask for a review of the answer they just got.
The Skeptical Analyst
Checks the facts — dates, numbers, names, attributions — and returns the correction next to the error.
The Subject Expert
Reads it as someone who knows the field, and flags what's missing: the context that changes the conclusion, the caveat that got dropped.
The User Advocate
Asks whether the answer is actually useful for what your student is trying to do, or just sounds like it is.
What comes back is a short report: what's wrong, what's missing, and what to ask next. The last part matters most — a student who knows which question to ask has learned something the answer alone wouldn't have taught them.
What it isn't
-
Not an AI detector
It doesn't tell anyone whether AI was used. It isn't built to police, and it can't be used that way.
-
Not permission to use AI
If your student's teacher hasn't allowed AI on an assignment, running the output through Qu Review doesn't change that. Check the syllabus — we say so on the student page too.
-
Not infallible
The reviewers are AI too. They catch a great deal, and they'll sometimes miss something or flag something that's fine. The point isn't a verdict your student can lean on — it's a second voice in the room that disagrees. That's the habit worth building.
How it works
You sign up.
They use it.
-
You buy the seat.
Billing stays with you — $59 for their first year, then $99 a year. Cancel anytime.
-
You send them the invite link.
Text it or email it. One tap on their end.
-
They activate it with their own email.
It runs inside ChatGPT and Claude, on their own account. Nothing to install.
You handle billing. Plan, payment, and cancellation are yours — plus 25 free reviews on your own account, so you can see exactly what they're getting.
You don't see their work. You see that they activated the seat, and whether it's been used this month. Never what they asked, and never what came back.
A real tool, not a monitoring app. That's exactly why they'll use it.
Where this came from
It wasn't built for school.
That's the point.
Qu Review was built for people whose work depends on the AI being right — analysts, researchers, consultants who needed a second opinion before acting on an answer.
Students turned out to need the same thing, for a different reason. A professional checking AI usually knows enough about the subject to catch a bad answer. A student researching something new doesn't — which makes them the harder case, not the easier one, and the case where a second opinion matters more.
Give them a better way
to use what they already use.
Billed today, then $99 a year. Cancel anytime.